This week, I'm re-blogging a post I wrote for one of my publisher's
blog (when I was writing for Musa). I think it's timely as the sale of
printed books are on the increase.
I’m here to discuss a friend's
point of view -- one that hadn't occurred to me before. I’m going to
wander a bit because I’m also talking books, but it all comes down to
love for the written word.
Some people love e-books, some loathe
them. I know some hate the term ‘e-book’ and I take that argument on
board. A ‘book’ is a bound set of pages. Maybe it would be more accurate
to call the electronic file of a book an e-novel or e-story because I
don’t feel the presentation affects the content. The story ‘exists’ the
moment the author penned it. When one used typewriters or even quills
and ink, that didn’t make the story exist any less, although by no
definition could hand written or typed pages be called ‘books’.
I'm
not against electronic files of books, but I still love paper books.
Always will. I admit there’s nothing like a physical book that can be
held in the hand. It’s nostalgic. If a gift, we may recollect when we
opened a brightly wrapped package, the moment we first set eyes on it,
felt that fission of pleasure, and spare a moment’s thought for the
person who gifted it. An electronic file, for the most part, lacks the
personal touch. An old book, even when it deteriorates with time… Well,
those creases in the spine and cover could have been put there over many
years of handling and love. I don’t see a scruffy book as one that has
necessarily been discarded or ill-used. Also, for someone like me who
spends a great deal of time in front of computer screens, then the
printed page is a departure from that, although e-readers are improving
all the time and this may not always be an issue.
Saying that,
there's room for both formats in my life simply owing to practicality.
For one thing, I write e-books and would be a total hypocrite to then
say I hate them. I don't hate them. I would love to live in the kind of
library the Beast gave to Beauty in the Disney film -- just push my bed
and a chair and table into the middle, I'll be fine -- but so far I’ve
yet to stumble across any enchanted castles even if I’ve found my Prince
Charming. I love all sorts of books from the classics to children’s
stories, fantasy and horror, and yes, some romances. I can be fussy
about my romances more than any genre, I think, but I do read them along
with all the other genres I love -- to call my book collection eclectic
is an understatement.
Unfortunately, I simply don’t have room
for all the books I would love to read and own. I’m one of those
readers, who, if I love a book, I struggle to part with it. I’ve
relatives who don’t understand this. They feel a book once read or a
film once seen is finished with. The story has been told; the
reader/viewer knows what will happen, so why read/watch it again. I
understand the point, but I disagree with it. A much-loved experience
can be enjoyed again. It can be enjoyed more because often one can miss
things on a first pass just as an author can during the writing process.
Among
my many ‘wants’, I would love to own an entire library of classics.
I’ve an abiding love for them. It amazes me when I hear someone say
today that they’ve never read any of the literary greats. Black Beauty,
Heidi, Pride and Prejudice, Gulliver’s Travels, Oliver Twist...all these
books and more were among my childhood reads. I cannot even remember
them being referred to as ‘classics’ -- they were just books and they
were adventures. They took me to different worlds and gave me
experiences I would never have had otherwise. I read them alongside
stories such as The Water Babies, What Katy Did, Ballet Shoes, Charlie
and the Chocolate Factory and I never differentiated. Now they are
looked upon as stuffy, and dry, the language outdated. I cannot help
feeling that people were better educated, more eloquent and literate
when such books were read at a younger age. I was born at a time when
almost all parents read to their children, where I was given books for
older children than my age, and if I couldn’t read them right away, well
I wanted to, and it made me strive to learn. If I didn’t know a word my
parents handed me a dictionary and told me to look it up, and yes, I
took the time to do so. So these books have remained with me, ingrained.
The
electronic format has allowed me to revisit some of these classics I’ve
lost through moves, through lack of space. I am grateful. They are
adventures and memories revisited, and I can keep them in virtual
‘space’. Although I still often buy my favourite authors in print, I
have branched out and discovered others owing to electronic formats. I
would prefer a world where there wasn’t an argument for or against, but
where all can live in support and cooperation. In an advanced society,
life is about individual choice.
My thinking was personified when
speaking with a friend of mine. This friend is in his seventies and he
recently bought an e-reader...and adores it. His reason is simple -- he
has struggled to read a book for some time. His eyes aren’t quite as
they used to be and there may be other factors in his health, but
whatever the reason, he can ‘see’ the words better on his reader as
opposed to looking at a printed page. He can also increase the font size
if need be, or zoom in. His reader has made his whole reading
experience come alive again, and where he had as good as given up
reading, or took a long time to struggle through a single novel, he’s
reading again...devouring books, and what I saw in his eyes as he told
me all this was joy.
So I’m just putting this thought out there
for those very much against. Maybe e-books and e-readers aren’t for
everyone, and for some, they may never be, but I think this proves that
it’s pointless to criticise the needs of another person and that none of
us can know what we may one day need ourselves. Should there be anyone
saying they’d rather give up reading than commit sacrilege and read
electronic books, then I can only think nose, spite, face. I could never
give up reading. I’ve never heard such venomous arguments over audio
books, which many people enjoy who aren’t blind and who don’t have
seeing difficulties. The argument may stem from fear -- a dread that the
production of printed books will one day cease, and I understand that
emotion well. Without printed books, this would be a poorer world, but
one cannot ignore the increase of electronic formats -- something I knew
would take off long before the first e-reader was even conceived.
Simply, there may come a time where e-readers exist alongside things
like audio books and are considered as commonplace, where they’re a
lifeline for some, and -- just as someone brought books into my life to
enrich it -- in my ‘book’ that makes their existence tolerable and even
worthwhile.
No comments:
Post a Comment